<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xml:lang="en">
	<title>GREAT Blog</title>
	<subtitle>Grand River Environmental Action Team (www.great-mi.org)</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/index.html"/>
        <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/atom.xml"/>
	<updated>2008-05-23T17:11:53-04:00</updated>
	<author>
	<name></name>
	<uri>http://great.myblogsite.com/index.html</uri>
	<email>admin@fortunecity.com</email>
	</author>
	<id>tag:blog,2008:greatblog</id>
	<generator uri="http://www.pivotlog.net" version="Pivot - 1.30 RC: 'Rippersnapper'">Pivot</generator>
	<rights>Copyright (c) 2008, Authors of GREAT Blog</rights>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Free &quot;Green&quot; Fuel !</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry6.html" />
		<updated>2008-05-23T16:57:00-04:00</updated>
		<published>2008-05-23T16:57:00-04:00</published>
		<id>tag:blog,2008:greatblog.6</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Sports Connections (Horton Rd) owner, Roger Stevens, shows a green alternative to the high price of gasoline! What do you recommend to reduce your use of gasoline?</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry6.html"><![CDATA[
                <p>Sports Connections (Horton Rd) owner, Roger Stevens, shows a green alternative to the high price of gasoline! What do you recommend to reduce your use of gasoline?</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://great.myblogsite.com/images/rogerkayakfuel.jpg" style="border:0px solid" title="" alt="" class="pivot-image" /></p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Michgan Water Use Legislation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry5.html" />
		<updated>2008-05-08T17:24:00-04:00</updated>
		<published>2008-05-08T17:24:00-04:00</published>
		<id>tag:blog,2008:greatblog.5</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">The Michigan Legislature is considering legislation to tighten standards on the amount of water that can be drawn from water sources. The House Great Lakes and Environment Committee has reported to the floor some very tough versions of water use bills compared to the Senate versions. Jackson County House Rep Marty Griffin and GREAT member who is on this committee opposed these in committee because he feels they are unfair to farmers because their fees are excessive and restrictions too great on their permittted water quantities. Unlike the Senate, in the House, these controversial bills have been tied to the legislation for the Compact, which protects the water of the Great Lakes from being used outside of the Great Lakes basin. The Compact is expected to be approved by all Great Lakes states (including Michigan) and Canadian Providences and must be also approved by Congress. Farm and business groups are opposed to these tougher proposals the way they are currently written. To read the bills check http://greatlakesgreatmichigan.org/legislation.htm
Please feel free to make any comments on this very important topic.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry5.html"><![CDATA[
                <p>The <strong>Michigan Legislature</strong> is considering legislation to tighten standards on the amount of water that can be drawn from water sources. The House Great Lakes and Environment Committee has reported to the floor some very tough versions of water use bills compared to the Senate versions. Jackson County House <strong>Rep Marty Griffin</strong> and GREAT member who is on this committee opposed these in committee because he feels they are unfair to farmers because their fees are excessive and restrictions too great on their permittted water quantities. Unlike the Senate, in the House, these controversial bills have been tied to the legislation for the<strong> Compact</strong>, which protects the water of the Great Lakes from being used outside of the <strong>Great Lakes basin</strong>. The <b>Compact</b> is expected to be approved by all Great Lakes states (including Michigan) and Canadian Providences and must be also approved by <b>Congress</b>. Farm and business groups are opposed to these tougher proposals the way they are currently written. <strong>To read the bills check</strong> <a href="http://greatlakesgreatmichigan.org/legislation.htm">http://greatlakesgreatmichigan.org/legislation.htm</a></p>
<p>Please feel free to make any comments on this very important topic.</p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Why Are GREAT's Numbers Up?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry4.html" />
		<updated>2007-08-15T19:35:00-04:00</updated>
		<published>2007-08-15T19:35:00-04:00</published>
		<id>tag:blog,2008:greatblog.4</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">---Our membership now stands at 107; a 50% increase of where
we finished the year in 2006. ---Participation on our monthly canoe/kayak outings has twice set a new record,
with July having a whopping 65 paddlers!
---Donations are also up 
The GREAT Board would like to know why. Is it better publicity through
our improved
web site, a better circulated brochure of our events, or more media
announcements; better weather, or better run events? Is it all of the
above or some combination? You can help us. If you have an idea or an opinion, please enter a
comment accordingly.
Thanks! Jim</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry4.html"><![CDATA[
                <b>---Our membership now stands at 107; a 50% increase of where
we finished the year in 2006.</b><b> <br  /></b><p><b>---Participation on our monthly canoe/kayak outings has twice set a new record,
with July having a whopping 65 paddlers!<b><br  /></b></b></p><p><b><b>
---Donations are also up<b> <br  /></b></b></b></p><p>
The GREAT Board would like to know why. Is it better publicity through
our improved
web site, a better circulated brochure of our events, or more media
announcements; better weather, or better run events? Is it all of the
above or some combination? <br  /></p><p>You can help us. If you have an idea or an opinion, please enter a
comment accordingly.
Thanks! Jim
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Problems Without Borders</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry3.html" />
		<updated>2007-06-08T23:17:00-04:00</updated>
		<published>2007-06-08T23:17:00-04:00</published>
		<id>tag:blog,2008:greatblog.3</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">The May issue of Vanity Fair, which is their 2nd annual
"Green Issue" included an unique article with Maps made by a joint
project between University of Michigan
and Sheffield (U. K.). The maps are drawn in proportion
to what countries or regions of the world are responsible for positive or
negative environmental actions. Interestingly, the US
was very positive on three of the six maps and negative on the other three. The
US is the best
or one of the best (positive) in the world in the categories of plants at plant
at risk, forest lost 1990-2000, and waste recycling. However, the US
was the worse or one of the worse when it came to fuel imports, net imports of
wood and paper, and the proportion of municipal waste.

Jim</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry3.html"><![CDATA[
                <p>The May issue of Vanity Fair, which is their 2nd annual
"Green Issue" included an unique article with Maps made by a joint
project between University of Michigan
and Sheffield (U. K.). The maps are drawn in proportion
to what countries or regions of the world are responsible for positive or
negative environmental actions. Interestingly, the US
was very positive on three of the six maps and negative on the other three. The
US is the best
or one of the best (positive) in the world in the categories of plants at plant
at risk, forest lost 1990-2000, and waste recycling. However, the US
was the worse or one of the worse when it came to fuel imports, net imports of
wood and paper, and the proportion of municipal waste.</p>
<br /><br />
<p>Jim</p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Green Energy Conflicts with Paddlers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry2.html" />
		<updated>2007-06-08T22:51:00-04:00</updated>
		<published>2007-06-08T22:51:00-04:00</published>
		<id>tag:blog,2008:greatblog.2</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Did any of you see the May/June 2007 issue of Paddler
Magazine? If you have not read it, but have access to the magazine, I strongly recommend
you read the article as it documents a major dilemma of worthwhile competing
goals.
This is a very interesting story about the fight between kayakers and the local
power authority who wanted encourage development of non-coal fire power plants
and kayakers who fought a proposed project on their favorite Ashlu River in British
Columbia. The project would not make the river as attractive and challenging to
kayaking. Eventually the proposed non-dam project was approved and is now being
constructed, but not without a long fight during which the process rules were
changed after the kayakers thought they had won. 
If you read this, which side do you generally agree with?

 Jim  
Does green energy pose a threat to paddlers?</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry2.html"><![CDATA[
                <p>Did any of you see the May/June 2007 issue of Paddler
Magazine? If you have not read it, but have access to the magazine, I strongly recommend
you read the article as it documents a major dilemma of worthwhile competing
goals.<b>
This is a very interesting story about the fight between kayakers and the local
power authority who wanted encourage development of non-coal fire power plants
and kayakers who fought a proposed project on their favorite Ashlu River in British
Columbia. The project would not make the river as attractive and challenging to
kayaking. Eventually the proposed non-dam project was approved and is now being
constructed, but not without a long fight during which the process rules were
changed after the kayakers thought they had won. <b></p><p>
If you read this, which side do you generally agree with?</p>
<br /><br />
<p> Jim <b> </p>
<a href="http://http://www.paddlermagazine.com/issues/2007_3/article_.shtml">Does green energy pose a threat to paddlers?</a>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Welcome!!</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry1.html" />
		<updated>2007-05-26T20:45:00-04:00</updated>
		<published>2007-05-26T20:45:00-04:00</published>
		<id>tag:blog,2008:greatblog.1</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Welcome to the Grand River Environmental Action Team (GREAT) Blog!        
Please feel free to post your comments and responses in regard to environmental issues and GREAT activities. 
Environmental issues are often complex and there are many viewpoints, even among environtalist. GREAT is dedicated to the promotion of the discussion and education of these issues. GREAT's focus is the Grand River of Jackson County, Michigan. However, local environmental issues have world wide implications and world wide environmental issues have local implications.
Let the discussion begin!
Jim Seitz, GREAT President
  </summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://great.myblogsite.com/entry1.html"><![CDATA[
                <p><strong><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: black" color="white">Welcome to the Grand River Environmental Action Team (GREAT) Blog!        </font></strong></p>
<p><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: black" color="white">Please feel free to post your comments and responses in regard to environmental issues and GREAT activities. </font></p>
<p><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: black" color="white">Environmental issues are often complex and there are many viewpoints, even among environtalist. GREAT is dedicated to the promotion of the discussion and education of these issues. GREAT's focus is the Grand River of Jackson County, Michigan. However, local environmental issues have world wide implications and world wide environmental issues have local implications.</font></p>
<p><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: black" color="white">Let the discussion begin!</font></p>
<p>Jim Seitz, GREAT President</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://great.myblogsite.com/images/imge38.gif" style="border:0px solid" title="" alt="" class="pivot-image" /></p><strong>   </strong></p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
</feed>
